Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Calverley's avatar

Writing into the dark is sometimes inappropriate because in some forms of non fiction, there is a pattern that readers expect.

Some forms of writing are highly structured. Things like obituaries, scientific papers, college term papers, speeches, or instructions for almost any device you purchase today all have to be carefully thought out.

Those mellifluous words flowing from the mouths of politicians, talk show guests and tent revivalists almost always began life as crafted-by-the-critical-mind, writing.

In print journalism, specifically newspapers, the default pattern is the inverted pyramid. The most important facts come first followed by the rest of the facts in descending order of importance. If a reader doesn’t learn what the story is about in the first sentence or two, s/he might skip reading the story.

The simple way to describe the inverted pyramid is “getting to the point.” It is a very important writing technique that has been around forever, longer than journalism.

Getting to the point is something you can practice using your conscious critical mind until it becomes second nature. Then it will work whenever you write into the dark. You’ll be a second-level nonfiction writer.

Expand full comment
Balázs Jámbor's avatar

It is an interesting approach. I think it depends on what kind of non-fiction one writes. Yes, if we know the inns and outs of the topic, it can be written WITD, but what if we don't? What if we want to write non-fiction to learn something? I think we shouldn't get discouraged: from school we already know ton of things, and for example we know where to start study a topic. But there is a little landmine. Non-fiction also can be a wide area...

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts