Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter's avatar

>>>put the thought into your mind that you’re looking to break the book into individual, shorter novels.

I'm currently going through Part 1 (115,00 words) of my 3-book series (of which you edited #2) for the dreaded quote marks. It's all coming together nicely, thank you very much. I'm thinking of breaking it up into two novels, but time will tell as I proceed with correcting various "" marks (grin) while I refresh my memory along the way.

I do have a dilemma, though, as I mentioned in another post. Part 3 has come to a standstill as I do the part 1 edits. Unfortunately (or fortunately, I'm certain) I've halted at a section where killing or not killing someone is eating away at me. While it's on the back burner for now, the direction I want to go is bothering me. In your opinion, should I take on writing both ways and let the fallout land where it wants to go? Or might I choose only one and do the same? I think I know the answer, but another opinion wouldn't hurt.

I finally got your substack links straightened out. As mentioned, it was not your links, but a VPN problem.

Expand full comment
Dawn Turner's avatar

I had this experience with one of mine years back. It ended up over 200K in length. I did exactly as Harvey suggested - I read through it and found 3 natural break points. Imagine my surprise when those break points resulted in 4 roughly-50K novels. I was surprised they were close together in length and loved it. Instead of a single HUGE novel, I ended up with a quadrilogy. Worked out well.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts